<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="UTF-8" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:fireside="http://fireside.fm/modules/rss/fireside">
  <channel>
    <fireside:hostname>web02.fireside.fm</fireside:hostname>
    <fireside:genDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 22:49:52 -0500</fireside:genDate>
    <generator>Fireside (https://fireside.fm)</generator>
    <title>Coder Radio - Episodes Tagged with “Object Oriented Programming”</title>
    <link>https://coder.show/tags/object%20oriented%20programming</link>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2019 13:30:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <description>A weekly talk show taking a pragmatic look at the art and business of Software Development and the world of technology.
</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle>A weekly talk show</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>The Mad Botter</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>A weekly talk show taking a pragmatic look at the art and business of Software Development and the world of technology.
</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/b/b44de5fa-47c1-4e94-bf9e-c72f8d1c8f5d/cover.jpg?v=7"/>
    <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>The Mad Botter</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>michael@themadbotter.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
<itunes:category text="Technology"/>
<itunes:category text="Education">
  <itunes:category text="How To"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Business"/>
<item>
  <title>366: Functional First</title>
  <link>https://coder.show/366</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">0a8e1caf-432b-47df-9ef2-6791b03d63d7</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2019 13:30:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>The Mad Botter</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/b44de5fa-47c1-4e94-bf9e-c72f8d1c8f5d/0a8e1caf-432b-47df-9ef2-6791b03d63d7.mp3" length="27996496" type="audio/mp3"/>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>The Mad Botter</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>It’s a Coder Radio special as Mike and Wes dive into functional programming in the real world and share their tips for applying FP techniques in any language.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>38:53</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/b/b44de5fa-47c1-4e94-bf9e-c72f8d1c8f5d/cover.jpg?v=7"/>
  <description>It’s a Coder Radio special as Mike and Wes dive into functional programming in the real world and share their tips for applying FP techniques in any language. 
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>Redis, webassembly, wasm, ruby F#, C#, .NET, functional programming, Clojure, Haskell, static types, data driven development, immutability, OOP, object oriented programming, programming paradigms, Rafal Dittwald, Solving Problems the Clojure Way, mapreduce, ruby, mechanize, web scraping, software design, software architecture, API design, programming culture, reframe, redux, react, FRP, reactive programming, data flow, data pipeline, idempotent, mocking, integration tests, testing, Jupiter Broadcasting, Developer podcast, Coder Radio</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>It’s a Coder Radio special as Mike and Wes dive into functional programming in the real world and share their tips for applying FP techniques in any language.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Porting Redis to WebAssembly with Clang/WASI" rel="nofollow" href="https://medium.com/fluence-network/porting-redis-to-webassembly-with-clang-wasi-af99b264ca8">Porting Redis to WebAssembly with Clang/WASI</a> &mdash; In this post, we share our experience of porting an existing open-source software package — the data structure server Redis — to WebAssembly. While this is not the first time that Redis has been ported to Wasm (see this port by Sergey Rublev), it is the first time to our knowledge that the obtained port can be run deterministically.</li><li><a title="Solving Problems the Clojure Way - Rafal Dittwald" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vK1DazRK_a0">Solving Problems the Clojure Way - Rafal Dittwald</a> &mdash; It is said that Clojure is a "functional" programming language; there's also talk of "data-driven" programming. What are these things? Are they any good? Why are they good? In this talk, Rafal attempts to distill the particular blend of functional and data-driven programming that makes up "idiomatic Clojure", clarify what it looks like in practise (with real-world examples), and reflect on how Clojure's conventions came to be and how they continue to evolve.</li><li><a title="The Value of Values with Rich Hickey" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6BsiVyC1kM">The Value of Values with Rich Hickey</a> &mdash; In this keynote speech from JaxConf 2012, Rich Hickey, creator of Clojure and founder of Datomic gives an awesome analysis of the changing way we think about values.</li><li><a title="Clojure Made Simple by Rich Hickey" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSdnJDO-xdg">Clojure Made Simple by Rich Hickey</a> &mdash; In the seven years following its initial release, Clojure has become a popular alternative language on the JVM, seeing production use at financial firms, major retailers, analytics companies, and startups large and small. It has done so while remaining decidedly alternative—eschewing object orientation for functional programming, C-derived syntax for code-as-data, static typing for dynamic typing, REPL-driven development, and so on. Underpinning these differences is a commitment to the principle that we should be building our systems out of fundamentally simpler materials. This session looks at what makes Clojure different and why.</li><li><a title="Effective Programs: 10 Years of Clojure by Rich Hickey" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2V1FtfBDsLU">Effective Programs: 10 Years of Clojure by Rich Hickey</a></li><li><a title="sparklemotion/mechanize" rel="nofollow" href="https://github.com/sparklemotion/mechanize">sparklemotion/mechanize</a> &mdash; Mechanize is a ruby library that makes automated web interaction easy.</li><li><a title="How to write idempotent Bash scripts" rel="nofollow" href="https://arslan.io/2019/07/03/how-to-write-idempotent-bash-scripts/">How to write idempotent Bash scripts</a> &mdash; It happens a lot, you write a bash script and half way it exits due an error. You fix the error in your system and run the script again. But half of the steps in your scripts fail immediately because they were already applied to your system. To build resilient systems you need to write software that is idempotent.</li></ul>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>It’s a Coder Radio special as Mike and Wes dive into functional programming in the real world and share their tips for applying FP techniques in any language.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Porting Redis to WebAssembly with Clang/WASI" rel="nofollow" href="https://medium.com/fluence-network/porting-redis-to-webassembly-with-clang-wasi-af99b264ca8">Porting Redis to WebAssembly with Clang/WASI</a> &mdash; In this post, we share our experience of porting an existing open-source software package — the data structure server Redis — to WebAssembly. While this is not the first time that Redis has been ported to Wasm (see this port by Sergey Rublev), it is the first time to our knowledge that the obtained port can be run deterministically.</li><li><a title="Solving Problems the Clojure Way - Rafal Dittwald" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vK1DazRK_a0">Solving Problems the Clojure Way - Rafal Dittwald</a> &mdash; It is said that Clojure is a "functional" programming language; there's also talk of "data-driven" programming. What are these things? Are they any good? Why are they good? In this talk, Rafal attempts to distill the particular blend of functional and data-driven programming that makes up "idiomatic Clojure", clarify what it looks like in practise (with real-world examples), and reflect on how Clojure's conventions came to be and how they continue to evolve.</li><li><a title="The Value of Values with Rich Hickey" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6BsiVyC1kM">The Value of Values with Rich Hickey</a> &mdash; In this keynote speech from JaxConf 2012, Rich Hickey, creator of Clojure and founder of Datomic gives an awesome analysis of the changing way we think about values.</li><li><a title="Clojure Made Simple by Rich Hickey" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSdnJDO-xdg">Clojure Made Simple by Rich Hickey</a> &mdash; In the seven years following its initial release, Clojure has become a popular alternative language on the JVM, seeing production use at financial firms, major retailers, analytics companies, and startups large and small. It has done so while remaining decidedly alternative—eschewing object orientation for functional programming, C-derived syntax for code-as-data, static typing for dynamic typing, REPL-driven development, and so on. Underpinning these differences is a commitment to the principle that we should be building our systems out of fundamentally simpler materials. This session looks at what makes Clojure different and why.</li><li><a title="Effective Programs: 10 Years of Clojure by Rich Hickey" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2V1FtfBDsLU">Effective Programs: 10 Years of Clojure by Rich Hickey</a></li><li><a title="sparklemotion/mechanize" rel="nofollow" href="https://github.com/sparklemotion/mechanize">sparklemotion/mechanize</a> &mdash; Mechanize is a ruby library that makes automated web interaction easy.</li><li><a title="How to write idempotent Bash scripts" rel="nofollow" href="https://arslan.io/2019/07/03/how-to-write-idempotent-bash-scripts/">How to write idempotent Bash scripts</a> &mdash; It happens a lot, you write a bash script and half way it exits due an error. You fix the error in your system and run the script again. But half of the steps in your scripts fail immediately because they were already applied to your system. To build resilient systems you need to write software that is idempotent.</li></ul>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
<item>
  <title>365: Objectively Old</title>
  <link>https://coder.show/365</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">6de2350f-c728-4a0a-92bc-aa86e636c877</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2019 22:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>The Mad Botter</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/b44de5fa-47c1-4e94-bf9e-c72f8d1c8f5d/6de2350f-c728-4a0a-92bc-aa86e636c877.mp3" length="27448238" type="audio/mp3"/>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>The Mad Botter</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>Wes turns back the clock and explores the message passing mania of writing Objective-C without a Mac, and we wax-poetic about programming language history.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>38:07</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/b/b44de5fa-47c1-4e94-bf9e-c72f8d1c8f5d/cover.jpg?v=7"/>
  <description>Wes turns back the clock and explores the message passing mania of writing Objective-C without a Mac, and we wax-poetic about programming language history.
Plus Mike gets real about the Windows Subsystem for Linux, and our take on the new MacBook keyboard leak. 
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>Macbook, server side development, backend development, developer laptop, keyboard, butterfly keyboard, scissor-switch keyboard, design, jony ive, GNUstep, language time travel, iOS, Smalltalk, programming languages, programming challenge, 7 languages, swift message passing, OOP, object oriented programming, C++, Objective-C, WSL, Windows, Linux, VSCode, windows development, Jupiter Broadcasting, Developer podcast, Coder Radio</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>Wes turns back the clock and explores the message passing mania of writing Objective-C without a Mac, and we wax-poetic about programming language history.</p>

<p>Plus Mike gets real about the Windows Subsystem for Linux, and our take on the new MacBook keyboard leak.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Apple is reportedly giving up on its controversial MacBook keyboard - The Verge" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.theverge.com/2019/7/4/20682079/apple-butterfly-switch-scissor-switch-2019-macbook-air-2020-macbook-pro">Apple is reportedly giving up on its controversial MacBook keyboard - The Verge</a> &mdash; Apple is planning to ditch the controversial butterfly keyboard used in its MacBooks since 2015, according to a new report from analyst Ming-Chi Kuo. 9to5Mac notes that Apple will reportedly move to a new scissor-switch design, which will use glass fiber to reinforce its keys. According to Kuo’s report, the first laptop to get the new keyboard will be a new MacBook Air model due out this year, followed by a new MacBook Pro in 2020. </li><li><a title="Objective-C - History - Wikipedia" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objective-C#History">Objective-C - History - Wikipedia</a> &mdash; After acquiring NeXT in 1996, Apple Computer used OpenStep in its then-new operating system, Mac OS X. This included Objective-C, NeXT's Objective-C-based developer tool, Project Builder, and its interface design tool, Interface Builder, both now merged into one application, Xcode. Most of Apple's current Cocoa API is based on OpenStep interface objects and is the most significant Objective-C environment being used for active development.</li><li><a title="A Short History of Objective-C" rel="nofollow" href="https://medium.com/chmcore/a-short-history-of-objective-c-aff9d2bde8dd">A Short History of Objective-C</a> &mdash; While most programmers discovered Objective-C only during the iPhone app revolution, Objective-C has been around for over 30 years. Objective-C has been the foundation of Apple’s desktop operating system, Mac OS X, since its debut in 2001, and was also the basis for NEXTSTEP — OS X’s immediate ancestor — created by Steve Jobs’ NeXT Computer Inc. However, Objective-C was created neither by Apple nor NeXT. Its origin was a small Connecticut startup in the early 1980s called Stepstone.</li><li><a title="GNUstep" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.gnustep.org/">GNUstep</a> &mdash; GNUstep is a mature Framework, suited both for advanced GUI desktop applications as well as server applications. The framework closely follows Apple's Cocoa (formerly NeXT's OpenStep) APIs but is portable to a variety of platforms and architectures.

</li><li><a title="GNUstep: Fun with Objective-C" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.gnustep.org/resources/ObjCFun.html">GNUstep: Fun with Objective-C</a> &mdash; Objective-C is a language based upon C, with a few additions that make it a complete, object-oriented language. Why do I think Objective-C is fun? Precisely because of this emphasis on simplicity</li><li><a title="Beginners Guide to Objective-C Programming" rel="nofollow" href="http://gnustep.made-it.com/BG-objc/">Beginners Guide to Objective-C Programming</a></li><li><a title="Installing and Using GNUstep and Objective-C on Linux - Techotopia" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.techotopia.com/index.php/Installing_and_Using_GNUstep_and_Objective-C_on_Linux">Installing and Using GNUstep and Objective-C on Linux - Techotopia</a> &mdash; The basics of Objective-C are supported by the GNU compiler collection. In order to utilize the full power of Objective-C together with the Cocoa /openStep environments on Linux, and to work with many of the examples covered in this book, it is necessary to install gcc, the gcc Objective-C support package and the GNUstep environment.

</li><li><a title="Objective-C Compiler and Runtime FAQ - GNUstepWiki" rel="nofollow" href="http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/Objective-C_Compiler_and_Runtime_FAQ">Objective-C Compiler and Runtime FAQ - GNUstepWiki</a> &mdash; The history of Objective-C in GCC is somewhat complicated. Originally, NeXT was forced to release the original Objective-C front end in order to comply with the GPL. This code was not quite compatible with the GNU runtime and so it was modified. NeXT did not adopt these modifications and so each release of GCC by NeXT, and then Apple, contained changes that needed back-porting to the main branch of GCC.

For a long time, GCC was the only compiler that worked with GNUstep. Unfortunately, the GCC team has not invested much effort in Objective-C in the last few years and it currently lags behind Apple's version by a significant amount.

</li></ul>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>Wes turns back the clock and explores the message passing mania of writing Objective-C without a Mac, and we wax-poetic about programming language history.</p>

<p>Plus Mike gets real about the Windows Subsystem for Linux, and our take on the new MacBook keyboard leak.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Apple is reportedly giving up on its controversial MacBook keyboard - The Verge" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.theverge.com/2019/7/4/20682079/apple-butterfly-switch-scissor-switch-2019-macbook-air-2020-macbook-pro">Apple is reportedly giving up on its controversial MacBook keyboard - The Verge</a> &mdash; Apple is planning to ditch the controversial butterfly keyboard used in its MacBooks since 2015, according to a new report from analyst Ming-Chi Kuo. 9to5Mac notes that Apple will reportedly move to a new scissor-switch design, which will use glass fiber to reinforce its keys. According to Kuo’s report, the first laptop to get the new keyboard will be a new MacBook Air model due out this year, followed by a new MacBook Pro in 2020. </li><li><a title="Objective-C - History - Wikipedia" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Objective-C#History">Objective-C - History - Wikipedia</a> &mdash; After acquiring NeXT in 1996, Apple Computer used OpenStep in its then-new operating system, Mac OS X. This included Objective-C, NeXT's Objective-C-based developer tool, Project Builder, and its interface design tool, Interface Builder, both now merged into one application, Xcode. Most of Apple's current Cocoa API is based on OpenStep interface objects and is the most significant Objective-C environment being used for active development.</li><li><a title="A Short History of Objective-C" rel="nofollow" href="https://medium.com/chmcore/a-short-history-of-objective-c-aff9d2bde8dd">A Short History of Objective-C</a> &mdash; While most programmers discovered Objective-C only during the iPhone app revolution, Objective-C has been around for over 30 years. Objective-C has been the foundation of Apple’s desktop operating system, Mac OS X, since its debut in 2001, and was also the basis for NEXTSTEP — OS X’s immediate ancestor — created by Steve Jobs’ NeXT Computer Inc. However, Objective-C was created neither by Apple nor NeXT. Its origin was a small Connecticut startup in the early 1980s called Stepstone.</li><li><a title="GNUstep" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.gnustep.org/">GNUstep</a> &mdash; GNUstep is a mature Framework, suited both for advanced GUI desktop applications as well as server applications. The framework closely follows Apple's Cocoa (formerly NeXT's OpenStep) APIs but is portable to a variety of platforms and architectures.

</li><li><a title="GNUstep: Fun with Objective-C" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.gnustep.org/resources/ObjCFun.html">GNUstep: Fun with Objective-C</a> &mdash; Objective-C is a language based upon C, with a few additions that make it a complete, object-oriented language. Why do I think Objective-C is fun? Precisely because of this emphasis on simplicity</li><li><a title="Beginners Guide to Objective-C Programming" rel="nofollow" href="http://gnustep.made-it.com/BG-objc/">Beginners Guide to Objective-C Programming</a></li><li><a title="Installing and Using GNUstep and Objective-C on Linux - Techotopia" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.techotopia.com/index.php/Installing_and_Using_GNUstep_and_Objective-C_on_Linux">Installing and Using GNUstep and Objective-C on Linux - Techotopia</a> &mdash; The basics of Objective-C are supported by the GNU compiler collection. In order to utilize the full power of Objective-C together with the Cocoa /openStep environments on Linux, and to work with many of the examples covered in this book, it is necessary to install gcc, the gcc Objective-C support package and the GNUstep environment.

</li><li><a title="Objective-C Compiler and Runtime FAQ - GNUstepWiki" rel="nofollow" href="http://wiki.gnustep.org/index.php/Objective-C_Compiler_and_Runtime_FAQ">Objective-C Compiler and Runtime FAQ - GNUstepWiki</a> &mdash; The history of Objective-C in GCC is somewhat complicated. Originally, NeXT was forced to release the original Objective-C front end in order to comply with the GPL. This code was not quite compatible with the GNU runtime and so it was modified. NeXT did not adopt these modifications and so each release of GCC by NeXT, and then Apple, contained changes that needed back-porting to the main branch of GCC.

For a long time, GCC was the only compiler that worked with GNUstep. Unfortunately, the GCC team has not invested much effort in Objective-C in the last few years and it currently lags behind Apple's version by a significant amount.

</li></ul>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>
